Pages

Monday, July 14, 2014

Chapter 14 - A Marriage Takes Place

Once again, what strikes me about this chapter is its directness;  it moves from Claire's waking out of a hangover, to preparing for the wedding, to the wedding itself, swiftly and seamlessly. 

Also once again, new words unapologetically assault my understanding. A "ewer" and basin (a wide-mouthed pitcher for water); a "sempstress" (another word for seamstress, rather understandable, that one) and "serge" (describing her typical woollen fabric of her day to day clothing). Here are some snippets from this quickly moving narrative:

Claire describes her morning after the whiskey drinking:
I eased myself very carefully back down, closed my eyes and held onto my head to prevent it from rolling off the pillow and bouncing on the floor.
Ha. I remember a doozy of a hangover I once had after a night of (over)drinking after a military base command party many, many years ago. My problem was everything was spinning, and spinning: the room, the bed, the world. And the worst part was nothing would make it go away. Even my eyelashes hurt. My eyelashes. I wondered if anyone had ever died from a hangover.
"A bit later I sat on the bed, fully dressed, feeling dazed and belligerent, but thanks to a glass of port supplied by the goodwife, at least functional. I sipped carefully at a second glass, as the woman tugged a comb through the thickets of my hair."
The fact that she was supplied some port wine to offset her hangover made me think. The few times in my younger days where I may have "overindulged" I've never had additional alcohol the next day; in fact, that would be the last thing I would be willing to do. I know I've heard of "the hair o' the dog", but does that really work?
Dougal caught sight of me slowly descending, and abruptly stopped talking. The others fell silent as well, and I floated down in a most gratifying cloud of reverent admiration."
What a great visualization. The words just seem to conjure the image in real time as Claire, prepared for the wedding, now comes down the stairs, shockingly beautiful to those who have only seen her in her serge.
"Wherever we were going, it was some distance from the village. We made a rather morose wedding party, the bridal pair encircled by the others like convicts being escorted toward some distant prison."
This made me laugh, but also made a striking simile for how Claire must have felt. Prison. An unknown time, practical strangers all around, and here she is tending to one of life's most precious and rare moments with a man she hardly knows. Prison, indeed.

I'm sure this is exactly how Claire and Jamie
would have looked on their wedding day.
If Jamie was a 40-year old, Irish-bred actor from New York.
And if they were 500 years earlier.
And in the movie Braveheart.
Yup. Exactly like that.
"Through the drizzle and mist, I saw the chapel jutting out of the heather. With a sense of complete disbelief, I saw the round-shouldered roof and the odd little many-paned windows, which I had last seen on the bright sunny morning of my marriage to Frank Randall."
Oh, no, she di'int. Really? Diana didn't just go there, did she? Yup. She did. Married in the same chapel as her wedding to Frank?

Ok, gang, this is where I'm havin a wee bit o' disagreement with me wife. Why the heck is Claire never thinking about Frank?! I mean, with the chapel and all, of course she's going to think about Frank, but he's rarely even mentioned in her thoughts up to this point. Here she is, in a strange time and society, undergoing all kinds of strange experiences and forging new and strained relationships, yet she never yearns for her Frank, for the familiar, for the constancy of that shared oneness. Here she is, separated from her husband, her true love, unless...unless, of course he isn't. Hmm. (No spoilers, please.)
“It’s a bit pagan, but it’s customary hereabouts to have a blood vow, along with the regular marriage service...‘Ye are Blood of my Blood, and Bone of my Bone. I give ye my Body, that we Two might be One. I give ye my Spirit, ’til our Life shall be Done.’"
A Celtic rite known typically as "handfasting"; it is still practiced in various forms among the Wiccans and nature religions (although not always with the actual blood-letting), and the chant of "blood of my blood, and bone of my bone." But even on it's surface, it can be seen that it is a corruption of the original in the book of Genesis:
Genesis 2:22-23 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. (23) And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Changing the "flesh of my flesh" into "blood of my blood" of course is necessary for the blood vow portion. However, it is indeed historically accurate for the time of Claire and Jamie. Technically, there is no specific biblical pattern anyway for what we would consider a typical wedding ritual. The rings, vows, and any other accouterments are all traditions of the distant past cultures that have been added over the years as couples have pledged their unity.

And then, as if a harbinger of things to come (of which I know you all are waiting with bated breath), Diana leaves us with this light-hearted couplet:
“Mmmphm. Aye, we’re married, right enough. But it’s no legally binding, ye know, until it’s been consummated.” A slow, fierce blush burned its way up from the lacy jabot.
“Mmmphm,” I said. “Let’s go and find something to eat.”
Well done, Claire. Some protein and carbs will serve ye weel for the comin' chapter...


14 comments:

  1. Aye, laddie, ye are well and truly hooked now, aye? Love Diana's use of language and the way we learn from her choices of vocabulary and how she strings all the lovely words together. "a gratifying cloud of reverent admiration" - the "lads" were dumbstruck by the vision of her loveliness floating down the stairs, be she ever so hung over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Connie, I do like the way Diana writes. It seems to me as though there isn't a spare word left on the page; everything is rich in meaning and full of thoughtful connections.
      I did find a humorous picture of a bride laying on the floor at the bottom of a staircase; that's probably more likely how Claire felt she may have ended up!

      Delete
  2. As far as her missing Frank, from what I remember they had been living apart for quite some time during the war. So maybe wether or not he is her true love she has grown used to not having him there on a day to day basis...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's understandable, Ana. It does make sense in that light. I guess I have just been married too long to know anything different, and I know I would have lots of thoughts about where my wife was and what might be going on back home!

      Delete
    2. Me too... almost 9 years now and I can't sleep without my hubby.

      Delete
  3. I have read Outlander at least five times, and had not realized that this chapel was the same one in which she was married to Frank! Wow! Just goes to show how much you miss in previous reads! Thanks, Steve, enjoying your reviews!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Jean! As kids we used to play a game where we had to look at an atlas or a globe and pick out an unusual geographic location and see if the other kids could find it. The easiest way to win was to pick the really large words that went aallllll the way across the page. Everyone would miss it because they would be looking for the tiny, tiny words in remote locations. Worked every time!

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Serge is a very practical fabric. it is both lightweight and warm. My late father had several serge suits.

    I also wondered about Claire moving on from Frank so quickly. She has only been in this time for a few months. At the beginning of the novel she seemed quite passionate towards Frank and now she is marrying someone else. I appreciate the reaso for the marriage, but Claire seemed awfully willing.

    The bloodletting to seal a marriage was also practiced by some of the Native American cultures. I did not know until reading Outlander that the Scots practiced it also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, Silver, after reading your comment, I did a little online research and saw just how versatile (and still popular) serge fabric is. This is one of the other things I really enjoy about Diana's writing, is all of the rabbit trails that open up when I encounter something unfamiliar to me.
      Thanks for your thoughts on Claire moving on from Frank. My wife had some good points also in regards to how they were not together much due to the war, so there wouldn't be as much of a connection.
      There are definitely some bloody traditions among many cultures, including Native Americans. I remember watching "A Man Called Horse" as a youngster, and the Sun Vow initiation ritual was, um, pretty grueling at that age (just Google that if you haven't heard of it). And this was a movie we watched in school for history class!

      Delete
    2. I had no idea about serge fabric! Thanks for the lesson. Sun Dance ceremony is a very interesting ritual, done with total selflessness. I don't think I could ever do it. I've studied some on this (a while back) and it's very interesting.

      Delete
  6. Your eyelashes, eh? Wow...that must have been a doozy!

    My thoughts on Claire not making over about Frank. They had been separated for 6-7 years of their marriage due to the war, only seeing each other twice; this after being married for only a very short time prior to the war breaking out. Mrs. Graham (Rev. Wakefield's housekeeper noted that Claire would not pine for what she couldn't have:

    "No, no, lass. It doesna mean anything's like to happen to your good man. It's only that if it did," she emphasized the "if" with a slight squeeze of my hand, "you'd not be one to pine away and waste the rest of your life in mourning. What it means is, you're one of those can love again if your first love's lost."

    So, we have Claire attempting to get back to the stones (and failing) and in doing so putting Dougal's party in danger (after having been kept a "guest" at Leoch). Women were not so free to safely travel alone in those times as Claire has learned. Further, the war years, and those spent traveling with her Uncle Lamb, taught her to adapt to her situation (especially being a nurse during the war).

    Her thoughts were not filled with a pity party or pining for Frank, for she knew if she could get back to the stones she'd get back to Frank. So the stones were her immediate goal. Being the practical person she is, it makes sense to me.

    As for Claire seeming "awfully willing" to marry Jamie, I didn't get that at all....thus the reason for getting totally wasted. She was simply put in a situation to choose marry Jamie and have relative safety or Black Jack. I know what I'd choose!!

    I often wonder if the bible actually was written in a way to appease belief systems prior to that of Monotheism; looking for ways to unite this new belief (maybe the Megalithic People and their rituals, etc - which lead us to Celts, etc) to the one God belief. So, maybe the pagan ritual actually came before the woman fashioned from a rib theory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your detailed thoughts, Sherri. I must say, you made my wife very happy, as your description of why Claire might not have had such a strong connection with Frank is almost word for word how she explained her perception to me, as well! "...relative safety [with Jamie] or Black Jack...", heck, my wife said she would pick Jamie just because he was hot!

      Yes, the foreshadowing with Mrs. Graham, the pragmatism learned with her Uncle Lamb; all of these are understandable points. But here once again my thoughts differ, based on how well you stated her situation: "Her thoughts were not filled with a pity party or pining for Frank, for she knew if she could get back to the stones she'd get back to Frank." So, playing a little game of perceptions, my thought process goes something like this: if she thought getting back to the stones could get her back to Frank, then she would acknowledge he should be alive somewhere, or rather "somewhen". Therefore, while not necessarily pining for him, his reality would still be a potentially tangible possibility for her to achieve, ergo (whew) her refusal to be railroaded into marrying Jamie, because 1945 and Frank is still the end goal.

      Anyway, it makes no nevermind since this is a fictional story with fictional situations actually contrived to force these two head-strong characters together, so all of my rather tangential rationalizations are really rather moot. But I like seeing how passionate everyone is about their opinions!

      A worldview perspective indeed makes all the difference, yes? Are the ancient belief systems corruptions of the older biblical accounts, or is the bible simply a synthesizing of the evolution of older ancient beliefs? On the surface, one theory is as good as another. While there are many people who have spent lifetimes committed to historical verification of various ancient documents, it really comes down to which experts anyone would choose to consider the most reliable that cause our individual biases (and, of course, our environmental upbringing and experiences).

      For me, personally, my own beliefs (biases?) are not dependent on a demonstration of the age of the biblical records, but what they claim to contain, how I interpret what they mean, and how my experiences have been influenced by them. Faith is indeed a strange and wonderous thing that colors everything it touches. I know I have very strong convictions, but one of my goals in life is to demonstrate a respect for others' equally passionate, yet perhaps different, convictions in the hopes that they would respect mine, as well. "Therefore all things whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you even so to them..." So far, this wisdom has been very helpful to me.

      I really appreciate your comments, Sherri, and I hope you continue to stop by once in a while! Thank you!

      Delete
    2. Your wife and I are on the same page - lol. I really do understand your thoughts on the what about Frank issue and your follow up expresses it quite well. As for the answer.....no spoilers allowed ;-) I can't wait for you to reach the point in the book, if only to recall this point in the book. With Ms. Gabaldon there's always more (which is why we love her so much).

      Beliefs. Such wonderful things these convictions can be; or not. Religious wars, hate, intolerance. Yet there is also profound love, charity as well. It's such a conundrum. In my touch on belief studies it seems they all tie together somewhere, somehow. As for Christian beliefs and practices so many of the stories can be found in other practices (to bring the masses together). Ritual, no matter, brings comfort and community. When used in conjunction with the Golden Rule you share above it produces some of the most wonderful gifts of life! As for ritual, being raised in the Catholic Church (as is Jamie and Claire having been christened Catholic) maybe I pick up on some little things that a non-catholic might not (not to assume your religious affiliation).

      I absolutely LOVE your insights and favorite quotes as you get sucked further into the vehemently fervent fan club that is Outlander. You are part of the Outlander side (hey, it's not the Dark side at least - lol).

      Delete